Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

DPP v Smith (a pseudonym) [2025] ACTSC 500 — Statutory Interpretation — Barrister AI

DPP v Smith (a pseudonym)

[2025] ACTSC 500

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Statutory Interpretation
1. Criminal Offence Provisions
1. Maximum penalty under s 56 of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT)
1. latest instalment in history of construction of s 56

Case Details

Citation[2025] ACTSC 500

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2025DPP v Smith (a pseudonym) (No 2)ACTSC 501
2012Derbas v RNSWCCA 14
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on4

2025DPP v Smith (a pseudonym) (No 2)ACTSC 501
2019KN v The QueenACTCA 37
1997KBT v RHCA 54
1989S v RHCA 66

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works