For a place to be a 'public place' under s 4 of the Intoxicated People (Care and Protection) Act 1994 (ACT), the public must actually and legally enjoy access with the express or implied permission of the owner; physical accessibility alone is insufficient. The IPCPA requires the person actually to be in a public place — it is not sufficient that the detaining officer believed on reasonable grounds the person was in a public place. Internal communal areas of residential unit complexes with 'Tenants Only' signage are not public places for the purposes of the IPCPA. The 'forthwith' release obligation in s 212(3) of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) does not require physical release where police simultaneously identify another lawful basis for detention.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.