Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Bye v Hend [2025] ACTSC 94 — Practice & Procedure — Barrister AI

Bye v Hend

[2025] ACTSC 94

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice & Procedure
1. application to withdraw admissions
1. where admissions deemed by omission to respond to Notice to Admit Facts
1. where delay but stage of proceeding permitted withdrawal without prejudice

Case Details

Citation[2025] ACTSC 94

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by3

2026Target Australia v Smart Trike (withdrawal of admissions)FCA 1309
2026Hubexo Australia Pty Ltd v CoreLogic Australia Pty Ltd (Amendment of Defence and Tendency Notice)FCA 1310
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on10

2019Carr v NeedhamACTSC 98
2016Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm)FCAFC 2
2011In the matter of Le Meilleur Pty Ltd (subject to Deed of Company Arrangement); Le Meilleur Pty Ltd (subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) & Ors v Jin Heung Mutual Savings Bank Co Ltd & AnorNSWSC 1115
2009Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National UniversityHCA 27
and 6 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works