Chapple v Workpac Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1487 — Legal Practitioners & Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI
← Back
Chapple v Workpac Pty Ltd
[2025] FCA 1487
Federal Court of Australia
1 December 2025
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Legal Practitioners
›
leave to appeal interlocutory decision to dismiss application to restrain solicitor for the second respondent from acting
›
allegation that the second respondent’s solicitor made misrepresentations to the applicant
›
allegation that the legal representative acted as a mere mouthpiece
›
court’s jurisdiction to restrain legal representatives from acting
›
no basis to restrain second respondent’s solicitor from acting
›
leave to appeal refused
Practice and Procedure
›
where applicant is a self-represented litigant
›
extent of court’s obligations to assist self-represented litigants
›
allegation that applicant not afforded procedural fairness
›
where applicant did not understand certain legal terminology and procedures
›
allegation of apprehended bias by primary judge
›
no reasonable prospects of success
›
leave to appeal refused
Case Details
Citation
[2025] FCA 1487
Court
FCA
Jurisdiction
Commonwealth
Decision Date
1 December 2025
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2025] FCA 1487
40 authorities it relies on
1936
1954
1972
1990
2008
2025
Relies on
40
2025
Maclean v Brylewski, in the matter of Maclean
FCAFC 133
2025
EBW21 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
FCA 341
2025
AIX20 v Director-General of Security
FCAFC 38
2025
Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Lavazza Australia Pty Ltd
FCAFC 12
and 36 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
