applications for non-publication orders under s 37AF
where individuals identified in documents filed in proceeding
whether orders are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice
Quick Take
1The public interest in providing proper protection and respect for the rights and beliefs of Aboriginal people can inform the exercise of discretion under s 37AF on the ground in s 37AG(1)(a), such that confidentiality orders over culturally sensitive information provided during ATSIHP Act consultation processes may be necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice.
2Disclosure of confidential cultural information voluntarily provided under s 10 of the ATSIHP Act would undermine the statutory consultation process by deterring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples from participating, which constitutes prejudice to the administration of justice.
3Under s 37AG(1)(c), the safety ground is made out where the risk of harm — assessed by reference to gravity, likelihood and nature — rises above the level reasonably regarded as acceptable, even where some identifying information has already been published in the media.
Case Details
Citation[2025] FCA 1527
CourtFCA
JurisdictionCommonwealth
Decision Date5 December 2025
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.