The Minister's identification of a factor as 'relevant' in s 501BA decisions does not impose an obligation to make factual findings on that factor; jurisdictional error arises only where the Minister identifies a non-mandatory matter as a proper basis for disposing of the case but then fails to consider it.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 13 later cases that cite this judgment.
9 of the 13 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.