The Court held that a notification letter refusing a visa application complied with s.66(2)(d)(ii) of the Migration Act where it stated the 21-day review period and, on a later page, stated the deemed date of receipt, even though it did not specify the exact deadline date. The notification was sent to the applicant's nominated email address (which happened to be his ex-wife's email), and the fact that the applicant had not updated his contact details before the decision was sent did not render the notification invalid. The Tribunal's finding that it lacked jurisdiction due to the late filing of the review application was upheld.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.