A special purpose vehicle developer's pattern of distributing all sale proceeds to related entities can ground the requisite danger for freezing orders under UCPR r 25.11, even where such distributions are ordinary and commercially rational for the entity, and the notion of 'unjustifiable' disposition is an unnecessary gloss on the rules.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.