Attorney General for NSW v MM (a pseudonym) by his tutor Barbara Ramjan

• 1. Constitutional Law (Cth)
  2. › Inconsistency of laws
  3. › Section 109 of the Constitution
  4. › Operational inconsistency
  5. › Whether State provision for compulsory production of documents inconsistent with Commonwealth provision protecting documents from production
  6. › Whether inconsistency depends on proper construction of Commonwealth provision
  7. › Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW), s 138
  8. › National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth), s 67G
• 1. Statutes
  2. › Interpretation
  3. › Construction of Commonwealth legislation
  4. › Meaning of 'duties, functions or powers under this Act'
  5. › Whether phrase is composite expression
  6. › Whether 'under' extends beyond functions conferred or imposed directly by the statute
  7. › Whether registered NDIS provider performs duties, functions or powers 'under' the NDIS Act when providing supports to participants
  8. › National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth), s 67G
• 1. Statutes
  2. › Interpretation
  3. › Meaning of 'under' an enactment
  4. › Whether activities merely regulated by statute are performed 'under' the statute
  5. › Distinction between activities enabled or mandated by statute and activities merely regulated by statute
  6. › National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth), s 67G
• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › National Disability Insurance Scheme
  3. › Registered NDIS providers
  4. › Protection of documents from compulsory production
  5. › Whether documents held by registered provider in course of providing supports are protected from compulsory production
  6. › National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth), s 67G

Quick Take