A servient owner's refusal to consent to a development application that proposes works extending the driveway slightly beyond the right of way boundary onto the dominant tenement may constitute substantial interference with the dominant owner's easement rights, assessed as a practical evaluative judgment; the two questions in Lowe v Kladis at [100] are relevant considerations, not a generic test.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.