FRP v R

• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal against sentence
  3. › Misapplication of principle
  4. › Assessment of objective seriousness
  5. › Whether characterisation given by sentencing judge was reasonably open
  6. › Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M, 66C, 66DB
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal against sentence
  3. › Misapplication of principle
  4. › Prospects of rehabilitation
  5. › Whether remorse and insight are preconditions for engagement in treatment courses
  6. › Whether absence of remorse precludes finding of good prospects of rehabilitation
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal against sentence
  3. › Misapplication of principle
  4. › Personal deterrence
  5. › Whether sentencing judge erred in finding personal deterrence was a significant factor
  6. › Whether erroneous reasoning about rehabilitation affected assessment of personal deterrence
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentencing
  3. › Sexual offences
  4. › Aggravated sexual assault
  5. › Indecent assault
  6. › Circumstances of aggravation
  7. › Victim under authority
  8. › Victim under 16 years of age
  9. › Resentencing on appeal
  10. › Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M(1), 61M(2), 66C(1), 66C(2), 66DB(a)

Quick Take