A judge determining a claim of sexual assault communication privilege under s 299D of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) must examine the documents produced under subpoena to assess whether they have substantial probative value; the correctness standard of appellate review applies to such decisions.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.