Dp v R

• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeals
  3. › Appeal against conviction
  4. › Miscarriage of justice
  5. › Tendency evidence
  6. › Failure to give anti-tendency direction
  7. › Whether failure to direct jury as to proper use of context evidence occasioned miscarriage of justice
  8. › Whether objectively reasonable forensic basis for defence counsel not to seek anti-tendency direction
  9. › Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 97
  10. › Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(b)
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeals
  3. › Appeal against conviction
  4. › Miscarriage of justice
  5. › Tendency evidence
  6. › Irregularities in treatment of tendencies and supporting evidence at trial
  7. › Whether disparity between tendency notice and tendency direction occasioned miscarriage of justice
  8. › Whether inclusion of evidence outside tendency notice occasioned miscarriage of justice
  9. › Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 97, 100
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeals
  3. › Appeal against conviction
  4. › Proviso
  5. › Whether proviso under s 6(1) of Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) applies
  6. › Whether guilt proved beyond reasonable doubt on admissible evidence
  7. › Whether credibility issues preclude application of proviso
  8. › Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1)
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Practice and procedure
  3. › Duties of prosecutor
  4. › Tendency evidence
  5. › Whether Crown ought to articulate relevance of tendency evidence in opening and closing

Quick Take