The King v Thompson [2025] NTSC 17 — Admissibility And Relevance — Barrister AI
← Back
The King v Thompson
[2025] NTSC 17
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Evidence
›
Admissibility and relevance
›
Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) s 97, s 137
›
Tendency evidence
›
whether probative value of tendency evidence outweighs any potential prejudicial effect on the accused
›
Evidence not admitted
Criminal Code Act 1983 (NT), s 208H(1)
Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT), s 97, s 97(1), s 97(1)(a)
Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; (2017) 263 CLR 338; IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14; (2016) 257 CLR 300, referred to
Case Details
Citation
[2025] NTSC 17
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2025] NTSC 17
2 authorities it relies on
2016
2018
2020
2022
2025
Relies on
2
2017
Hughes v The Queen
HCA 20
2016
IMM v The Queen
HCA 14
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
