Equitable securitisation of a mortgage does not affect the registered mortgagee's right to seek possession, as the legal interests of the parties remain governed by the loan agreement and registered mortgage. A mortgagor's argument that the Crown's original title is defective cannot be sustained as the acquisition of sovereignty is not justiciable. Silence as to securitisation in pre-contractual negotiations does not constitute actionable misrepresentation where there is no duty to disclose. Lender's mortgage insurance is irrelevant to the mortgagee's entitlement to possession.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.