The King v Mackintosh [2025] NTSC 9 — Evidence & Exclusion Under S 66(3) — Barrister AI
← Back
The King v Mackintosh
[2025] NTSC 9
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+11 more
Evidence
›
whether statements recorded by police of young complainant
amounts to a proof of evidence or information of what evidence would be
given should the complainant be called
›
exclusion under s 66(3)
›
evidence
admitted. Whether evidence admissible under s 21B Evidence Act (NT)
Case Details
Citation
[2025] NTSC 9
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2025] NTSC 9
3 authorities it relies on
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2025
Relies on
3
2023
The King v Dixon (No 2)
NTSC 101
2004
Saunders v R
TASSC 95
and 1 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
