Chief Executive of Queensland Corrective Services v Kay

• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Judicial review
  3. › Striking out judicial review application
  4. › Whether construction of statutory disciplinary power was arguable
  5. › Whether validity of underlying direction is precondition to disciplinary finding
  6. › Public Service Act 2008 (Qld), s 187(1)(d)
  7. › Judicial Review Act 1991 (Qld), ss 15, 48
• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Judicial review
  3. › Adequate alternative remedy
  4. › Whether appeal to Queensland Industrial Relations Commission was adequate alternative to judicial review
  5. › Where challenge involves collateral attack on validity of administrative directions
  6. › Public Service Act 2008 (Qld), s 193(1)
• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Judicial review
  3. › Collateral challenge
  4. › Whether collateral attack on validity of administrative directions permissible in judicial review of disciplinary finding decisions
  5. › Whether abuse of process
• 1. Statutes
  2. › Interpretation
  3. › Text, context and purpose
  4. › Construction of disciplinary power provision
  5. › Whether 'reasonably satisfied' test applies to validity of direction or only to employee's conduct
  6. › Public Service Act 2008 (Qld), s 187(1)(d)
  7. › Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s 14A

Quick Take