R v LBN

[2025] QCA 260

Queensland Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal and new trial
3. › Appeal against sentence
4. › Grounds for interference
5. › Sentence manifestly excessive or inadequate
6. › Youth offender sentenced to detention with conditional release order
7. › Whether sentence manifestly excessive
8. › Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld), ss 150, 175, 176, 208, 209, 219, 220
1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal and new trial
3. › Appeal against sentence
4. › Grounds for interference
5. › Specific error in sentencing process
6. › Failure to consider all available sentencing options
7. › Whether sentencing judge complied with statutory methodology requiring consideration of alternatives to detention
8. › Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld), ss 208, 209
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Youth justice
4. › Conditional release orders
5. › Power to make conditional release order when child on remand for other matters
6. › Whether immediate release requirement precludes CRO where child in custody on unrelated charges
7. › Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld), ss 56, 219, 220, 224, 225, 226

Quick Take

A conditional release order under s 220 of the Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld) is not precluded by the child being on remand for other matters at the time of sentencing, and the chief executive may suspend the program under s 226 until the child is released from remand custody.

Case Details

Citation[2025] QCA 260

CourtQCA

JurisdictionQueensland

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2026R v SezQCA 80

Relies on5

2022R v SDWQCA 241
2022R v IjQCA 138
2014Kentwell v The QueenHCA 37
1999Lowndes v RHCA 29
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in