An appeal from a refusal of adjournment, being a discretionary interlocutory decision on practice and procedure, requires demonstration of House v The King error and calls for appellate restraint; proposed Human Rights Act grounds that are hypothetical and not anchored to the facts will not support an extension of time.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.