› Whether applicant who consented to dismissal after failing to provide security for costs should pay respondents' costs
› Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), r 685
Practice and Procedure
› Costs
› Reserved costs
› Apportionment where application sought multiple forms of relief
› Whether costs should be apportioned where respondent succeeded on security for costs but summary dismissal application was premature
Practice and Procedure
› Security for costs
› Effect of failure to provide security
› Whether impecuniosity is a reason not to make costs order against party who consented to dismissal
Quick Take
Impecuniosity is not a reason to decline to make a costs order against a party who consents to dismissal of appeal applications after failing to provide security for costs.
