← Back
Ab v Rathjen
[2025] TASSC 30
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
Procedure
›
Civil proceedings in State and Territory courts
›
Discovery and interrogatories
›
Discovery and inspection of documents
›
Discovery of documents
›
Discretion of court and power to order - Application for discovery under r 386(2) limited to matter in question in a proceeding
›
Categories of documents not relevant to matters in question in the proceeding
›
Application dismissed.
Aust Dig Procedure [1229]
Procedure
›
State and Territory courts: Jurisdiction, powers and generally
›
Inherent and general statutory powers
›
Control of court procedure
›
Supreme Court's inherent powers relevant to these proceedings do not include the power to compel the plaintiff to serve the first defendant
›
Application dismissed.
Aust Dig Procedure [1015]
Case Details
Citation
[2025] TASSC 30
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2025] TASSC 30
4 authorities it relies on
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Relies on
4
2004
Re Monger; Ex Parte Cross
WASCA 176
2004
Channel Seven Adelaide P/L v Lane & Hurley
SASC 177
2002
Segal t/as Segal Litton & Chilton v Fleming
NSWCA 262
2000
Cigna Insurance Asia Pacific Ltd v Packer
WASCA 415
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works