Burgess & Ors v Tucker & Ors [2025] TASSC 35 — Evidence & Aust Dig Evidence [1173-1178] — Barrister AI
← Back
Burgess & Ors v Tucker & Ors
[2025] TASSC 35
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Evidence
›
Client legal privilege - Whether the defendant doctor's responses to Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency complaint by the plaintiff attract privilege
›
Advice privilege - Litigation privilege.
Aust Dig Evidence [1173-1178]
Evidence Act 2001, ss 117, 118(c)
Case Details
Citation
[2025] TASSC 35
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2025] TASSC 35
5 authorities it relies on
1976
1986
1996
2006
2016
2025
Relies on
5
2025
Holt v Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
FCA 191
2024
Hoe v Kode
TASSC 51
2011
Powercor Australia Ltd v Perry & Anor
VSCA 239
1999
Esso Australia Resources v Commissioner of Taxation
HCA 67
and 1 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
