Barker v Cann [2025] TASSC 37 — Family Provision & Aust Dig Succession [1419] — Barrister AI
← Back
Barker v Cann
[2025] TASSC 37
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Succession
›
Family provision
›
Requirement for adequate and proper maintenance
›
Duty of testatrix
›
Duty to children
›
Duty to the testatrix's adult sons who were provided a gift estimated at $132,399.47 out of an estate estimated at $1.96m
›
Applicants of good health and financially stable
›
Not satisfied that either applicant was left without adequate provision for their proper maintenance and support - Application dismissed.
Aust Dig Succession [1419]
Case Details
Citation
[2025] TASSC 37
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2025] TASSC 37
31 authorities it relies on
1938
1955
1972
1989
2006
2025
Relies on
31
2025
Muhl v Bailey
TASSC 24
2022
Karimalis v Kapodistrias
TASSC 25
2019
Steinmetz v Shannon
NSWCA 114
2016
Chan v Chan
NSWCA 222
and 27 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
