Godfrey v Bannon [2025] TASSC 39 — Appeal And Review & Aust Dig Criminal Law [3521] — Barrister AI
← Back
Godfrey v Bannon
[2025] TASSC 39
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Magistrates
›
Appeal and Review
›
Appeal against sentence
›
grounds for interference
›
whether sentence manifestly inadequate
›
appeals by Crown
›
principles applied by appellate court to Crown appeals
›
indecent assault
›
sentence not manifestly inadequate.
Aust Dig Criminal Law [3521]
Magistrates
›
Appeal and Review - Failure to make order pursuant to Community Protection (offender Reporting) Act 2005
›
error or mistake on the part of justice
›
no magistrate acting reasonably could have failed to find risk of future offending.
Aust Dig Magistrates [1349]
Case Details
Citation
[2025] TASSC 39
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2025] TASSC 39
5 authorities it relies on
1994
2000
2006
2012
2018
2025
Relies on
5
2011
Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen
HCA 49
2010
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa
NSWCCA 194
1999
Lowndes v R
HCA 29
1998
Visser, Claas v Smart, Jeanette Marjorie
TASSC 151
and 1 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works