In historical institutional sexual offence cases involving delays of 36 to 46 years, the loss of almost all adult supervisory staff as witnesses, combined with the loss of documentary records, may constitute forensic prejudice akin to the loss of alibi evidence that renders any trial unacceptably unfair and incurable by jury directions, particularly where tendency evidence risks serving as a 'gap filler' for otherwise weak individual charges.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.