Charisiou v The King

• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentence
  3. › Appeal
  4. › Manifest excess
  5. › Obtaining financial advantage by deception
  6. › Using false documents
  7. › Amount obtained in excess of $38 million
  8. › Whether total effective sentence of 12 years with non-parole period of 8 years manifestly excessive
  9. › Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), ss 82(1), 83A(2)
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentence
  3. › Sentencing considerations
  4. › Family hardship
  5. › Whether exceptional circumstances required
  6. › Whether Markovic v The Queen should be overruled
  7. › Whether s 5(2)(g) of Sentencing Act 1991 construed with Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 requires consideration of family hardship without exceptional circumstances threshold
  8. › Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), ss 5(1)(a), 5(2)(g)
  9. › Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), ss 17(1), 17(2), 32(1)
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentence
  3. › Totality
  4. › Orders for cumulation
  5. › Whether cumulation orders infringed principle of totality
  6. › Same course of conduct
  7. › Same victims
  8. › Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), s 16(1)

Quick Take