In single victim, single episode rape cases where the offender is sentenced as a serious sexual offender, different modes of penetration carrying additional humiliation and separate harm may justify substantial cumulation notwithstanding temporal proximity, and the Flynn principle of substantial concurrency does not establish a mathematical measure of appropriate cumulation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.