Appellant repeatedly refused to acknowledge his identity to the presiding judicial officers, resulting in the appellant being convicted of two offences of breach of bail
Whether the appellant had appeared in response to a bail undertaking even though he refused to acknowledge his identity
Consideration of the requirements under s 33 of the Bail Act 1982 (WA) for the court to deem a person to have entered into a bail undertaking when they have refused to sign the undertaking
Case Details
Citation[2025] WASC 10
CourtWASC
JurisdictionWestern Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.
