Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 17] [2025] WASC 224 — Practice And Procedure & Turns On Own Facts — Barrister AI
← Back
Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 17]
[2025] WASC 224
Supreme Court of Western Australia
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+5 more
Practice and procedure
Application by plaintiffs to admit historical valuation report of valuer pursuant to s 79C(1) of the Evidence Act 1906 (WA)
Whether author is a 'qualified witness' under s 79B of the Evidence Act 1906 (WA)
Application for leave to dispense with requirements made in relation to expert evidence
Case Details
Citation
[2025] WASC 224
Court
WASC
Jurisdiction
Western Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2025] WASC 224
10 authorities it relies on
1960
1973
1986
1999
2012
2025
Relies on
10
2025
Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 16]
WASC 216
2024
Palmer v Citic Ltd [No 12]
WASC 322
2023
Palmer v Citic Ltd [No 9]
WASC 238
2011
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar
HCA 21
and 6 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
