Kalaui Pty Ltd v Moove Holdings Pty Ltd

[2025] WASCA 23

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › Practice and procedure
3. › Strike out of appeal
4. › Disproportionate costs
5. › Appeal from District Court dismissing appeal from Magistrates Court
6. › Whether likely costs of appeal disproportionate to amount of claim
7. › Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (WA), s 43(3)
1. Appeal
2. › Practice and procedure
3. › Strike out of appeal
4. › Exercise of discretion
5. › Factors relevant to exercise of discretion
6. › Whether public interest in resolution of jurisdictional issues warrants allowing appeal to proceed
7. › Whether merits of appeal relevant to exercise of discretion
8. › Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (WA), s 43(3)

Quick Take

When the likely costs of an appeal from the Magistrates Court exceed the amount of the claim by a factor of five, the power to strike out under s 43(3) is enlivened, and the discretion will ordinarily be exercised to strike out the appeal unless there are compelling countervailing factors such as manifest merit or genuine public importance.

Case Details

Citation[2025] WASCA 23

CourtWASCA

JurisdictionWestern Australia

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Relies on5

2023Miller v McKnightWASCA 182
2012Raux v The State of Western AustraliaWASCA 1
2008Defendi v Eden Hill PlasterersWASCA 269
1981Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty LtdHCA 45
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in