Vicario-Adams v Relative Networks Pty Ltd

[2025] WASCA 78

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › Leave to appeal
3. › Appeal from interlocutory order concerning practice and procedure
4. › Refusal to order discovery of one of eight categories of documents
5. › Whether substantial injustice demonstrated
6. › Whether decision wrong or attended with sufficient doubt
7. › Special restraint in reviewing case management decisions
8. › Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA), s 60(1)(f)
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Discovery
3. › Discovery by categories of documents
4. › Corporations proceedings
5. › Whether discovery necessary for fairly disposing of proceedings
6. › Refusal of single category where other categories ordered
7. › Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA), O 26 r 7

Quick Take

Refusal of a single discovery category where relevant information is obtainable from other ordered categories does not constitute substantial injustice warranting leave to appeal from an interlocutory case management decision.

Case Details

Citation[2025] WASCA 78

CourtWASCA

JurisdictionWestern Australia

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on7

2025Vicario-Adams v Relative Networks Pty LtdWASC 60
2024Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Citic LimitedWASCA 168
2022Clough Limited v Forge Group Limited (in Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed)WASCA 179
2022Maek Pty Ltd v IbrahimWASC 285
and 3 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in