application for non‑standard discovery by categories of document
intellectual property proceeding
trade marks
Quick Take
1Non-standard discovery by category that seeks to disapply the r 20.14(1) and r 20.14(2) criteria requires the applicant to demonstrate that all documents in each proposed category are manifestly directly relevant to issues raised in the pleadings or affidavits; if the categories are not so confined, the order dispensing with those criteria should not be made.
2Where a party's grounds of appeal and particulars do not identify the factual issues to which proposed discovery categories relate, and no pinpoint references to supporting evidence are provided, the discovery sought is mere fishing and will be refused as not necessary for the just resolution of the proceeding.
3Even where a factual issue is agreed to be live, proposed discovery categories that are temporally, substantively or as to source far wider than necessary to address that issue will be refused as oppressive and disproportionate under s 37M.
Case Details
Citation[2026] FCA 1060
CourtFCA
JurisdictionCommonwealth
Decision Date3 August 2026
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.