Confirms that failure to respond to a s 359A invitation results in loss of entitlement to appear before the Tribunal under the cascading provisions of ss 359C(2), 360(3) and 363A, and that where an employer nomination has been finally refused, remittal of the associated visa application is futile as no different outcome can eventuate.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.