A fleeting expression of less than complete certainty about citizenship in cross-examination does not disclose a 'real possibility' of statelessness sufficient to require the Tribunal to consider the legal consequences of indefinite detention, where the applicant's own written submissions and other material supported the citizenship finding.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.