The Court dismissed all grounds of judicial review of a Tribunal decision refusing a protection visa, finding that the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings were open on the material, its reasoning was not legally unreasonable, and no denial of procedural fairness was established. The Court emphasised that without a transcript of the Tribunal hearing, it was difficult for the applicant to demonstrate that the Tribunal's assessments of oral evidence were not open to it, and that disagreement with factual findings does not constitute jurisdictional error.
The full text is available to signed-in members.