The case applies the established framework from Renshaw v NSW Lotteries for pro bono referrals, confirming that the Court will weigh the applicant's participation history, apparent merits, financial evidence, delay consequences, and demonstrated self-representation competence. A non-publication order will not be granted on the basis of subjective privacy concerns without cogent evidence sufficient to displace the principle of open justice.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.