The use of insurance-related terminology (e.g., 'premium', 'trigger', 'insurance') in a price-capping clause does not, without more, represent that third-party insurance will be obtained, particularly where the clause identifies the contracting party as the provider of the 'insurance', and therefore does not support misleading or deceptive conduct claims based on contractual language.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.