APPEALS — administrative review of conduct under privacy legislation — accuracy before use principle — whether Tribunal erred in finding that the respondent complied with the obligation to take reasonable steps to ensure accuracy of personal and health information before use, having regard to the purpose of proposed use — degree of specificity with which purpose of proposed use is to be identified — whether Tribunal erred in finding agency was entitled to take no steps to ensure the accuracy of personal and health information before use, where respondent had no reason to doubt accuracy of the information — whether Tribunal erred by finding that the obligation to ensure the accuracy of personal and health information may not be enlivened where the document containing the information no longer serves any purpose — amendment principle — whether Tribunal erred in finding that respondent had a discretion to decide whether any requested amendments to personal and health information were appropriate in circumstances where personal and health information was inaccurate — whether Tribunal denied appellant procedural fairness — whether Tribunal’s reasons were inadequate
