The Court of Criminal Appeal held that the sentencing judge erred by failing to consider the principles applicable to the sentencing of young offenders — specifically, whether the applicant's youth and immaturity reduced his moral culpability and whether general and specific deterrence should be moderated — and resentenced the applicant to a reduced aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years and 4 months.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.