Practitioners seeking s 10 dispositions must explicitly link all mitigating factors they wish considered to the s 10(3) criteria at first instance; a sentencing judge is not required to independently canvass s 21A(3) factors not raised in support of the s 10 submission. The case also confirms that CROs under s 10(1)(b) are not legally unavailable for corporate offenders, but a judge may properly note the limited practical utility of CRO conditions for corporations as a relevant consideration.
The full text is available to signed-in members.