The Court held that a 57-day notice period for termination of a 13-year oral distributorship agreement was unreasonable, but only marginally so — a reasonable period would have been approximately ten weeks. Applying Crawford Fitting Co, the Court found no extraordinary expenditure or effort warranting a longer notice period, and rejected claims for 6 or 12 months' notice. Critically, the Court interpreted the trailing Advantage Program commission scheme as vesting an entitlement in the distributor at the end of each financial year for commissions earned during that year, payable in 12 monthly instalments over the following year, so that termination could not extinguish already-accrued AP commission entitlements. Claims for misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct under the Australian Consumer Law were dismissed on the facts.
The full text is available to signed-in members.