The Court imposed a $450,000 fine (approximately 24% of the maximum penalty) for a Category 2 WHS offence where a forklift ran over an 18-year-old untrained worker, finding significant objective seriousness due to the obvious and foreseeable risk, the wholly inadequate safety system, and the worker's youth and vulnerability. The Court gave full weight to the defendant's strong subjective case including its clean record, early guilty plea (25% discount), comprehensive post-incident remediation, and demonstrated remorse, and found specific deterrence played only a limited role. Notably, the Court criticised the prosecution's failure to adduce detailed medical evidence of the worker's injuries, holding that clinical notes or treating medical reports should be provided at a bare minimum where injuries form part of the prosecutor's case, and declined to treat the victim impact statement as proof of asserted psychological injuries absent independent evidence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.