Goodman Stock & Station Pty Ltd v Tamworth Regional Council

[2026] NSWLEC 1033

NSW Land and Environment Court

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Development Appeal
2. › Conditions of consent
3. › Time limited consent
4. › Appropriateness of time limited consent
5. › Whether time limited consent serves valid planning purpose beyond probationary period
6. › Whether visual impacts inconsistent with desired future character of new industrial precinct
7. › Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 4.15, 4.17(1)(d)
1. Development Appeal
2. › Desired future character
3. › New industrial precinct
4. › Shipping containers as local distribution premises
5. › Whether development inconsistent with desired future character statement in Development Control Plan
6. › Whether shipping containers constitute buildings for purposes of building design controls
1. Development Appeal
2. › Conditions of consent
3. › Validity of conditions
4. › Newbury tests
5. › Whether time limited condition fairly and reasonably relates to development
6. › Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 4.17(d)

Quick Take

A time-limited development consent under s 4.17(1)(d) of the EPA Act may serve a valid planning purpose where there is an anticipated change to the character of an area that is not yet physically evident, and is not restricted to probationary or trial periods.

Case Details

Citation[2026] NSWLEC 1033

CourtNSWLEC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on11

2025Billyard Ave Developments Pty Limited v The Council of the City of SydneyNSWLEC 22
2023Willoughby City Council v Blanc Black Projects Pty LimitedNSWLEC 54
2017Royal Motor Yacht Club (Broken Bay) Pty Ltd v Northern BeachesNSWLEC 56
2015Papadopoulos v Blue Mountains City CouncilNSWLEC 164
and 7 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in