CONTRACT — construction — shareholders agreement — whether a loan default notice has been served in accordance with the shareholders agreement — whether there is a requirement for a further notice of default after a failure to remedy the breach within ten days — HELD — no requirement for a further notice of default — loan default notice was served in accordance with the shareholders agreement
CONTRACT — construction — shareholders agreement — where a security default notice was served in respect of shares provided as security to a third party in breach of the shareholders agreement — whether a deed poll purporting to remedy that breach extinguished the right to acquire shares under the shareholder agreement as a consequence of the security default notice — HELD — the right to acquire shares as a consequence of the security default notice arose immediately upon the breach and did not provide a period within which it may be remedied before the default arose
CONTRACT — construction — shareholders agreement — where the shareholders agreement provided that it would be automatically terminated upon the commencement of certain proceedings against the company — whether proceedings commenced against the company caused the shareholders agreement to be automatically terminated — HELD — on its proper construction, the proceedings commenced against the company were not proceedings that triggered the automatic termination of the shareholders agreement
EQUITY — equitable remedies — specific performance — the right of one shareholder to purchase shares of another shareholder under shareholders agreement to obtain controlling interest — where the shares are not freely or readily available on the open market — whether damages an adequate remedy — HELD — specific performance of right to acquire shares granted
Quick Take
1Where a shareholders' agreement distinguishes between defaults requiring a cure period (cl 10(a)(ii)) and defaults with no cure period (cl 10(a)(i), dealing with shares otherwise than in accordance with the agreement), the right to acquire shares under the latter arises immediately upon breach and subsequent remediation does not extinguish the accrued right.
2Damages are inadequate for breach of a share buy-out obligation in a private company where the acquisition would confer a controlling interest carrying a control premium not captured by the contractual valuation formula, reinforcing the general rule in Wong v Van Vlymen that specific performance is appropriate for shares not readily obtainable on the market.
3A contractual automatic termination clause triggered by proceedings to sanction an arrangement or compromise with creditors does not extend to general proceedings commenced against the company; and in any event, rights accrued from breaches prior to termination survive under a savings clause preserving rights in respect of past breaches.
Case Details
Citation[2026] NSWSC 1021
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.