In a 50/50 incorporated joint venture, one party's progressive withdrawal from management, cessation of contributions to expenses, and refusal to consent to commercially rational steps (such as reducing a guarantee) can constitute oppressive conduct warranting a buy-out order in favour of the other party, even where the oppressed party has disproportionately assumed financial risk.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.