The Court held that the 2012 Will was valid, finding no suspicious circumstances displacing the presumption of knowledge and approval where the testator had testamentary capacity and the will was duly executed. The alleged internal inconsistency between a clause giving the entire estate to one daughter and a statement expressing a wish to treat both daughters equally was rejected; the Court read the equality statement in context of the whole clause, which explained that the testator had already provided for the excluded daughter during his lifetime. The family provision claim was also dismissed, though the judgment text provided is incomplete on this issue. The Court also made significant procedural observations about the consequences of non-compliance with Court Book preparation directions under Practice Note SC Eq 1 and the impact of excessive evidentiary objections on hearing efficiency.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.