The Court refused a court-appointed trustee for sale's application to retrospectively increase his remuneration rates above those fixed in the original appointment order, holding that neither UCPR r 36.16(2)(b), the functus officio exception for changed circumstances, nor the inherent equitable jurisdiction conferred power to increase rates retrospectively, and that even if such power existed, the discretion would not be exercised where the delay in the administration was substantially attributable to the trustee's own conduct; the trustee's remuneration was fixed at $200,000 rather than the $303,239 claimed, and the trustee's indemnity from the trust fund for costs was confined to costs incurred before the contest became adversarial.
The full text is available to signed-in members.