1A partner's obligation under s 31(1) of the Partnership Act 1891 (Qld) to render true accounts and full information is not subject to a condition precedent that the requesting partner first establish the other partner's priority entitlements to reimbursement have been exhausted; imposing such a condition would thwart the very ability to obtain the accounting needed to assess those entitlements.
2Where the actual conduct of a trial confines the issues below what the pleadings or agreed questions would otherwise permit, a trial judge who decides a question on a basis not pressed by either party must afford the parties an opportunity to be heard on that basis before doing so; the breadth of the original pleading or question does not cure the departure from the issues as actually fought at trial.
3The characterisation of a relationship as a partnership is a legal conclusion arising from pleaded and proved facts; the failure to explicitly plead the existence of a partnership does not preclude relief based on that characterisation where both parties joined issue on the question at trial.
Case Details
Citation[2026] QCA 172
CourtQCA
JurisdictionQueensland
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.