This decision illustrates the practical application of s 237 leave criteria in a small proprietary company dispute, confirming that a detailed item-by-item analysis of alleged misconduct may be required to establish a serious question to be tried, and that courts will impose indemnity conditions (here $50,000) even where the applicant claims impecuniosity, particularly where prior interlocutory applications have failed and a statement of claim has been struck out.
The full text is available to signed-in members.