The Court held that entering a dwelling and sexually touching a sleeping vulnerable stranger on the inner thigh near the vagina constituted a 'serious sexual offence' under the DPSOA, distinguishing Phineasa, Tilbrook and Kynuna on the basis that the combination of a deliberate break-in, the victim's vulnerability, the proximity of touching to the vagina, and the inferred significant psychological harm elevated the conduct beyond mere physical contact to 'violence' as defined. The Court further held that the respondent's criminal history, psychiatric diagnosis (mixed cluster B personality disorder and polysubstance abuse), moderately high risk of sexual recidivism particularly in the context of methylamphetamine intoxication, and pattern of offending soon after release from custody established reasonable grounds for believing he was a serious danger to the community, warranting psychiatric assessment under s 11 of the DPSOA.
The full text is available to signed-in members.